
Wednesday, November 23, 2011
Music to Our Ears

Thursday, July 7, 2011
When Harry Lost Tommy


Wednesday, June 15, 2011
Commencement
Friday, May 20, 2011
Lyrical
Monday, May 16, 2011
All The King's Horses

Tuesday, May 10, 2011
We Will Never Forget

Thursday, April 28, 2011
From A to B



Sunday, April 17, 2011
Grammas & Grampas
Tuesday, April 12, 2011
My Golden Years
- The first American to receive a monthly Social Security check was Ida May Fuller. She paid $24.75 into the system after three years of payroll taxes but received $22,888.92 between retirement at 65 and her death at 100 years old.
- Currently, two 56-year-olds with average earnings will pay about $140,000 in dedicated Medicare taxes over their lifetimes but will receive about $430,000 in benefits following retirement.
- Social Security is largely a pay-as-you-go system in which the current taxes of the working pay for the benefits for the retired. The system’s “support ratio,” which measures the number of people of working age over the number of people beyond retirement age, has decreased from 5.3 in 1970 to 4.6 in 2010 and is forecasted to fall to 2.6 by 2050.
- The life expectancy of 65-year-old males in the U.S. has improved by about 5 years since 1970, though people on average are retiring one year earlier.
- Spending on health care programs and Social Security is projected to grow from roughly 10% of GDP today to 16% of GDP by 2035. By comparison, spending on all of the federal government’s programs and activities, excluding interest on debt, has averaged 18.5% of GDP over the past 40 years.



Thursday, April 7, 2011
Deadly Sin

Monday, April 4, 2011
The "WE" in "Web-Logging"
Over a cup of Caribou coffee at Denver International Airport this past weekend, I was pitching to Tegan an idea to write about for this blog. I was in the middle of brainstorming when she politely interrupted me to ask, “What do you think is the point of writing?” Admittedly, my immediate reaction was one of defense, as if she was insinuating that my idea was not worth writing about and questioning my ability to write at all. In hindsight that reaction was a little extreme, because, for a writer, she was asking a very pertinent question: Why write? Or, more specifically, why blog?
Now, I’m relatively new to the blogging community. Not just because this is only my fourth post, but also because I simply haven’t spent much time searching out and reading many blogs. When reading on the internet, I primarily stick to the NYTimes, WSJ, ESPN, the Economist and Bloomberg. I sometimes venture to the Huffington Post for more entertainment purposes. While one could argue that the opinionated columnists within these news sources write similarly to a blogger, their words are usually also published in print and subject to slightly more scrutiny. So it’s not exactly the same.
None of this is to say that I don’t find merit or value in blogging itself. In fact, it’s quite the opposite. I adamantly read Roger Ebert’s blog, which beautifully ponders anything that flashes across his intellectual curiosity. I’ve read most, if not all, of his posts and find truth within each and every one of them. I thoroughly enjoy the blog Things White People Like, which lampoons the pompous pursuits of hipster yuppies. A good friend of mine from Wisconsin has made it his life’s passion to photograph and write about all types of foods at taylortakesataste.com. Tegan’s sister Amanda wrote a blog while she was working in France for 10 months so friends and family could check-in with her experiences. Just these four examples show how blogging can have a very wide range of focus, use, and audience.
My undefined hesitation in entering the blogging universe came to life in The Social Network. About mid-way through the movie, Mark Zuckerberg is confronting his ex-girlfriend Erica Albright while she’s getting drinks with her friends. In reference to his vicious posting about her on the internet she quips, “As if every thought that tumbles through your head was so clever it would be a crime for it not to be shared.” There is an arrogant presumption inherent to blogging that anyone, let alone an entire audience, really cares about what you’re writing. Prior to the internet, the fact that an author would have to be endorsed by an accredited publisher weeded out all the writing better suited for a personal, handwritten journal. Nowadays, emboldened by the anonymity and unlimited reach of the internet, there are countless “writers” out there putting words together that are less than worthy of my, or anyone else’s, time
So, blogging is both extremely valuable and utterly worthless. Much in the same spirit of its intended purpose, nothing boils this conundrum down better than Twitter. On the one hand, the application’s immediate and shared communication helps communities cope and respond to natural disasters; assists revolutionaries in gathering and shaping their government; and spreads news of the world’s events at the most personal level. On the other hand, Twitter feeds the narcissism of its commonplace and celebrity users who feel the need to disseminate the intricate minutiae of their daily activities, turning the website itself into comedians’ fodder. Anyone who has seen Conan’s YouTwitFace bit knows what I’m talking about.
What it comes down to is that blogging is a tool. A lot like a hammer. And I’m not going to go so far as saying it can be used to create and destroy, because I’m not contrasting to hateful writing intended to hurt. A properly used hammer can be used to build a beautiful and useful home. However, if the carpenter loses his focus and that hammerhead misses its target, he’s going to have a bloody, bruised, and/or broken thumb. Same goes for blogging. If you stray from your focus, you’re only going to end up hurting yourself and no one is going to want to look at the result.
So, why blog? What should I use this tool for and how should I go about it? My answers to Tegan’s questions center on honest introspection in the pursuit of universal truth. That’s a little lofty, but let me explain. I believe that all of us are connected in our hope that we’re not alone. If, through open and honest discussion, I can strip my experiences down to their elemental particles, then I might be able to strike a chord with an audience. The specifics will be mine and the mode will vary from post to post, but the underlying meaning will be communal.
To give an example, I am currently reading The Blind Side by Michael Lewis (one of my favorite authors). During my flight this past weekend, I got to the part when the Christian southerner Leigh Ann Tuohy is first interacting with her future adopted son and NFL star Michael Oher. She is taking him to his very poor and dangerous neighborhood to buy him some new clothes. Before getting out of the car, she turns to him and asks, “You’ll protect me right?” After barely uttering a full sentence the entire car ride, he confidently responds, “I got your back.” Now this story is about these two very specific people, who were strangers at the time. But I know what it’s like to feel protected by someone else, or to feel the desire to protect another human being. And Michael Lewis knew that the idea of protection and, more specifically, family is universally understood. All these things came together in my subconscious to make my hair stand on end and feel a rush of human connection.
But Tegan took my answer one step further. Good writing, and therefore good blogging, has to extend beyond a sense of inherent truth. I can’t just write about things that people already know or feel. I have to do it in a way that retains interest. Using my previous example, I was affected by Leigh Ann’s and Michael’s story because of the way it happened, but also because of the way Michael Lewis wrote about it. Nothing demonstrates this balancing act better than a successful comedian. A good comic is “saying what we’re all thinking.” But, mostly because of stand-up comedy’s on-the-fly delivery, most people fail to recognize that each joke was methodically rehearsed at countless comedy clubs. Every pause, inflection, or emphasis is there for a reason: to keep you listening and laughing.
So that’s the why: to use my personal experiences to find common ground. That exploration will be for your benefit and for mine. The challenge is to keep it interesting.
Wish me luck.

Thursday, March 31, 2011
Layman's Terms
Tuesday, March 29, 2011
Greetings
What's your name? Where are you from? What do you do?
These are the three main questions we ask when we meet someone. I use these questions all the time, and I'm expecting it in return when I meet someone new. During the course of a casual first meeting, if a stranger skips these very basic steps, I almost feel like a social contract has been breached. I feel robbed of my meet-and-greet protocol. It is an actual comfort to have these questions in my pocket. For whenever I am confronted with a new face, whether it's because our mutual friends' attention have drifted away from us, we are filling the void while waiting on the bartender, or we simply met eyes on the el train, I know I have at the very least a good 10 minutes of conversation before I have to actually think of something to talk about with this person. And who knows, maybe I'm from the same area, which adds at least another 15 minutes.
It was my junior year while attending the University of Wisconsin - Madison. I was on the swim team there and we had just finished our final day at the Big Ten Championships. It is tradition to have a team dinner where all the families get together after the long weekend. The festivity usually transpires in some banquet hall at the hotel we are staying, which this year happened to be a beautiful place in Indianapolis called Holiday Inn. The coaches say a few words, we have a buffet meal, we chat, and all the guys, regardless of performance, can't wait to get out of there and just goof off with all this exhausted energy, just pining to get home and start the real celebrations.
The main purpose of the meal though is the getting together. The chatting. The meeting. The recounting of the weekend. We as social beings find comfort in eating as a large group, especially after a time period of stressful circumstances. Holidays, graduation, a death in the family, or in this case a competition. I don't really know why. Maybe it has something to do with the resulting feast after the exhilarating big hunt.
The parents usually know each other after spending so much time up in the stands watching us compete, but not always. My mom, my dad, and my friend Mikey, a senior, and his parents were sitting at a table donned with a paper tablecloth. We had just sat down to our meal of gourmet pasta and garlic bread upon a plastic plate. The father of one of the freshman on the team came over to our table and wanted to introduce himself. He had met Mikey's parents and wanted to make sure to meet mine, as I was a co-captain with Mikey and he wanted to meet the other captain's parents.
Now what transpired was absolutely nothing more than ordinary. To be honest, I don't remember exactly what was said, but I'm pretty sure everyone involved followed standard procedure. Afterwards, the man smiled, as did my parents, and we got back to our garlic bread. But then my dad said something that for some odd little reason has stuck with me. He looked at me and matter of factly said, "I wish, just for once, someone would ask not 'what do you do' or 'where are you from,' but 'who ARE you?'" Then he turned back to chatting with my mom. To him, it was a fleeting thought; to me, it has changed how I think about strangers.
Upon thinking about his gripe further, I realized that my father had a point. All too often we use these questions as a crutch, giving a facade that we really care about the person to which we are speaking. Don't get me wrong, there are times when I really am interested in what a new acquaintance is telling me when we first meet, and not just when it is a cute girl at the bar. But a lot of times it is simply filler. I feign interest in my new "friend" because I know our short time together will pass and, chances are, I will never see him again. I am polite, and I am rewarded in kind. But, really, what a waste of time for the sake of mere pleasantness; and why do anything in life if it is not genuine?
After constant usage, these three little questions, instead of simply describing certain aspects of who we are, actually start defining who we are, which, in reality, is utterly shallow. Why should my place of birth, in which I had no choice, define my personality? Why should the name my parents gave me, again in which I had no choice, define my character? Why should the job I took as a means to make money doing something I enjoy necessarily define my essence? As I respond to these simple inquiries repeatedly to stranger after stranger, I pigeonhole the definition of me in my redundant answers. My father was making sense.
However, before I was completely convinced he was right, I asked myself two follow up questions: If someone really did come up to me and asked, "who ARE you?" would I know how to truthfully respond? And, even if I could, would I want to share my innermost thoughts about myself with a total stranger? The simple answer to both these questions is a resounding "no."
We all, despite my sounding like Shrek with his onion analogy, have many layers to our personality, our character, our being. Each successive layer represents another boundary to whom we let inside. I have countless "friends" or acquaintances on my outmost layer; these are the passerbys with whom I make eye contact on the city's sidewalks as I make my trek home. The next layer would be the people I have met and, at the very least, discussed my name, my job, and my geographic origin. From there, the layers continue, with each stratum of my multi-dimensional character inhabited by fewer and fewer souls. Assuming I actually knew what to say, if I allowed a stranger to cut through all those layers and inform him of my true self when he asked me who I really am, it would rob my closest, innermost friends the value of our relationship that took many years, laughs, tears, and stories to create. Simply, it wouldn't be fair. And I, in turn, would feel cheated if it was that easy to get close to my best friends.
So, I would have to say that I am OK with these three questions when meeting someone new. As the old Chinese proverb says, "a journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step." Any relationship has to start somewhere, and these questions, despite being hackneyed and shallow, at least provide building blocks and common ground from which to grow. And considering that you and I are just starting to get to know each other, I thought it would be appropriate to begin with the casual and fully established meet-and-greet.
Hi. My name is Tom, though most of my friends call me Tommy. I live in Chicago but was born in Barrington, IL. I work as a Senior Investment Analyst at Prudential Capital Group.
Nice to meet you.
Sunday, March 27, 2011
New Beginnings...
As a human being, I go on through my daily life, a slave to routine, as if order and repetition provide my existence even a slice of meaning. I fret over the smallest occurrences. I am ecstatic with the most minute fortunes. I value my life by the progress of my career path, the joy of my social relationships, and the peace found within. I do this while trying to ignore the enormity and endlessness of forever, as it has become impossible to grasp. I focus on the minute details that make up my world because I am haunted by the vastness of eternity.
It is very easy to think of men and women who we believe have left their mark on history. Looking back, some great names instantly come to mind. Alexander the Great, still recognized as one of the greatest military leaders ever to have trampled this earth. Ghenghis Kahn, the fearless and ruthless leader of the Mongol Empire, to this day the largest contiguous empire in history. Julius Ceasar, Queen Elizabeth, George Washington. But legacies are not left only to great crusaders and leaders. Think of the greatest minds: Plato, Homer, da Vinci, Shakespeare, Curie, Einstein. Think of the greatest artists: Picasso, Dali, van Gogh, Monet. To keep it simple, think of some of the great names of our day: Jordan, Woods, Phelps, Nicholson, Hilary, Obama. These are only a few examples of people much bigger and greater than I.
For me, it is near impossible to think of these names and not feel my worth at the very least mitigated. Who am I compared to these people? What accomplishments have I done that could even be mentioned in the same breath as those of this very select group? Are they not human beings just as I am? Then why do I feel that, in the end, they will live on forever, and I will simply end up another forgotten soul?
It was impossible to answer these questions until the sheath over eternity, the veil covering forever was lifted. I had always felt that their legacy would go on to the end of time because of their impact on history, on thought, on politics, on sport, on life. Their story would be recounted, their theories studied, their works enjoyed, their names remembered forever. And this seemed like a reasonable assumption, for Alexander the Great ruled over 2,000 years ago and we still readily consider his name synonymous with the word conquerer. But will he still be remembered another 2,000 years from now? 100,000? A million years? A billion years? A trillion?
I realized that every person on this earth leaves a legacy. We all have an impact, and the question is not if or how big but simply how long. In reality, any pursuit to leave a permanent mark on this world is an effort in futility. Forever is bigger than all of us and greater than any individual. But due to our ability to learn history and imagine the future, we do not exist solely and linearly between our birthdate and the day we die. History lessons mesh into memory. Dreams mold into reality. We fool ourselves into thinking that we have been around since the beginning of time and will live forever, so we try to create a legacy or impact that will match that span of time. But it's simply not possible.
Eternity, endlessness, infinity. The concept of forever is impossible to truly fathom. Some people call it God. Some people call it Truth. But whatever one calls it, the reality of timelessness renders who we are and what we do insignificant. We can all agree that our lives are a defined slice of time, and mathematically, our fraction of infinity approaches zero. Our lives approach nothing.
Is this a grim conclusion? I don't think so. The weight of legacy and worldly impact have been lifted and a lightness remains. If my life is meaningless then my misfortunes and trials and mishaps are rendered meaningless as well. If my time on earth is definite against an indefinite backdrop, then the joy and happiness and fulfillment I reap from it are all that matters. For just because something is meaningless does not mean it is not real. My relationships are real. My bliss is real. My love is real. While my hate, my sadness, and my despair are also real, their meaningless allows me to let them go. My lightness of being allows me to choose what I hold on to, and therefore endless choice is the greatest gift of a life rendered meaningless by endless time.
I recently told a close friend that I made the choice to write a book. He instantly dismissed it. Someone in his mid-20's should not be spending his time looking back, dissecting what has happened, as autobiographies often do. Looking back is for those whose clock is reaching its time, for those whose harboring sandy shores are not too far off in the horizon. But this will be no autobiography, I explained to him. No doubt, there will be stories of moments and times that I believe have shaped me into the, I hope, unique human being I am today. But it will be less backward looking and more inward and more forward. I imagine myself reading the thoughtful, youthful, and lofty words within these pages when I am withered and approaching that harbor, wondering if I lived up to their promise.
There are times when I have felt very alone in this world, mostly during the few times in my life of heartbreak, loss, and suffering. There is no one on earth that could possibly understand what I am going through, I would feel. But it is times like that during which I am reminded that "every heart vibrates to that iron string." It is our shared universal humanity that brings us together. It is why comedians can make us laugh, why movies can touch our hearts, why books can touch our soul. It is our shared meaninglessness that forces us to give meaning to each other.
So, as I embark on this journey of using written word to portray my own muddled thought, I promise to be as real and as true to myself. As in all of life, I have no specific plan in mind. But I do hope to perhaps strike that iron string within myself and within anyone willing to listen. I am a nobody and this is my story.
